So is it fair? Is that fair to delay their qualification for 2 more years (time between publications of the results in 2019 and 2021) because they only miss less than 5 points out of 400? Having it all on the computer makes it extremely difficult to do this. In seiner Art ist dieses Seminar einzigartig, da es konzeptionell auf das Buch „Verfahrenspraxis EPÜ und PCT“, Gruner/ Großmann, Carl Heymanns Verlag/ Wolters Kluwer, abgestimmt ist und von einem der Autoren selbst gehalten wird. from D 12/07:www.epo.org/law-practice/case-law-appeals/pdf/d070012eu1.pdf(there are many others with the same standard text)6.2 ... "the abstract awarding of marks with noregard to the fit-to-practise criterion of Rule 4 IPREE or to the individual candidates' examination papers infringes the principle of objectivity in general and Article 8(b) REE in particular..."6.5 "Any marks awarded for reasons unrelated to the individual candidate's ability to answer the examination questions is absolutely irreconcilable with the aforementioned sole purpose of the EQE ... whatever "overriding" aspects might have been the reason for that measure." As that's the case as you rightly pointed out, anyone with 3 years experience just enroll now and skip pre EQE. Compensation was only available within the same year. You will be certain that the person marking sees exactly what you hand in.Your answer can be checked very quickly, forwarded to markers (possibly with one or more translations to assist the markers) very quickly. If they apply compensation for resitters then surely it is only right (and within the Supervisory board's power) to give a few discretionary marks for mEQE 2020. Der Kurs ist so konzipiert, dass er das gesamte … Mit der Lösung wurden 165 von 180 Punkten … [Mehr] The profession always has to deal with deadlines and unforeseen situations. And people resitting just one paper would be severely impacted by any disruption around that particular place, time and day.For example: a separate compensation within A/B/C as there is a big overlap in what is being tested, and with A/B you sometimes misunderstand the invention and fail that way.C has a legal element (novelty, inventive step, priority, non-oral disclosures), so that could compensate a couple of marks to D. And high marks on D could be used to compensate C. So if you got 70 marks on C, maybe you could compensate at 43 or 44 level on another paper.But they would have to apply it to all Main Exam candidates in the system, and not just the 2020 "sitters".The trick is coming up with a correct formula. I realise that there is an issue with papers, but it is still valuable to do them again. This should be changed anyway independent of the coronavirus situation. My thoughts are that for the health and safety of candidates and the public, it would be hard to see EQE exams take place in March 2021 unless alternative assessments can take place instead. I hope you will take my comments on this page as they are intended - they are not directed at any person in particular but merely at what appears to be an unfortunate set of circumstances. So anyone meeting those most basic of requirements can enrol for Main Exam 2021.You can only travel in one direction. I believe there should be a mixture/other means of assessments along with exams so that we don't rely entirely on one form of assessment as a checkpoint. It is cleae main EQEs are equally as affected as pre EQE but there is something for pre EQE but nothing for the main EQE. However, it remains uncertain as to whether the strict anti-COVID-19 measures taken by the governments of most countries to protect the health and safety of the public in general will be lifted in time for an EQE 2020 to be held later this year.We know how important the EQE is to the patent world and how much effort and time candidates invest in preparing for the examination, but in view of the current situation and the lack of certainty with regard to the future, we trust that everyone will understand the reasons for this decision.In these exceptional circumstances, the EPO and epi have made a thorough search for alternatives to ease this inconvenient situation for candidates of 2020 EQE as far as possible. At least initially, you will have to go to a test center. It does feel like if you have are the first time sitting the EQE 2020 exams, never failed pre-EQE but you are being triple penalised.First your pre-EQE 2020 peers are allowed free passes. I've heard that the Exam committee forgot to book some venues in time, so that's why this your the exam was planned so late, but that's only a rumour... . Ah. It was a complete disaster, with many appeals being filed and shouting matches between tutors and members of the examination committees at the tutors meetings. "This is before we even mention the basic fact that the exams have become progressively more difficult over the years to the point where papers from the 1990's seem positively easy." You could even argue that today's preEQE candidates are allowed to take the mEQE next year, but still have to do the preEQE next year as well if it is held, since that's what the rule says, or at least an interpretation that can be given. It is highly unlikely large gatherings are allowed way through to middle of next year. .... and they can already offer this in different countries in 2021 "according to the current format". That would have been fair. The exam fees do not cover the costs at all.A few years ago, the EPO pulled a lot of the examiners from the EQE system because they were under pressure to reduce the backlog of patent applications to be examined. So very good news in these dark times for the Pre-Exam candidates :-). To be honest morale and motivation for myself (an EQE candidate of 2020) is very low and my focus is not there. So the only risk management the EPO/EPI can do now is to somehow reduce the number of candidates.My proposal for reducing the number of candidates and for making this whole situation more “fair”.Criteria for passing the EQE are slightly amended:Candidates still will need to achieve 200 points in total and at least 45 points in each exam. E.g. Die Firma EQE bearbeitet im Rahmen Ihrer Tätigkeit bei namhaften Energieversorgern und Zulieferfirmen eine Grosszahl von Projekten. Der Kurs ist so konzipiert, dass er das gesamte HowTo für den D Teil der EQE vermittelt und die Teilnehmer am Ende des Seminars optimal vorbereitet sind, um mit dem Selbststudium früherer Examensaufgaben beginnen zu können. I understand some sort of limit or range needs to be set, but it really does not make sense).As said, the goal is: reduce the number of candidates for 2021 to help all involved while keeping the fit-for-practice standard. 11 REE] conditions ... are fulfilled." The current format is clearly the elephant in the room.Instead of looking at another way of assessing the candidates, one is discussing of either digitalizing it, or adapting the way the marks are distributed.A digitalization of the current form doesn’t solve any problem, on the contrary, it will introduce more problems, like providing proper venues with the right material.Adapting the way marks are distributed will introduce likewise other problems and more discussions. If not, the Supervisory board is clearly lacking any respect for this hard time they are giving the candidates, and by that for the whole EQE... Dear Griet, I agree that there should some changes and there should be a backup plan, but nobody knows yet what the situation will be like next year. And the passing rate was still quite low as well.Since then, they have changed a lot in the organisation, and that should not happen again.So they have some bad experiences with universally awarding extra marks and the unintended consequences. A copy is shown below: Posted by Roel van Woudenberg at 08:28. It can work if they apply it to all mEQE candidates next year. [Mehr] Blog. The effort to support such a scheme would only make sense if it significantly reduced the number of candidates next year. Or think of it this way - if you enroll for Main Exam 2021 - even just a single paper - you are effectively considered as having passed the pre-exam 2020.The pre-exam was cancelled, and therefore under Article 11 REE only the other requirements (regarding registration and years of experience) apply. Neuvorstellungen & Erlkönige Mercedes EQE (2021) Elektro-E-Klasse mit 600 km Reichweite. I do not see why this cannot be implemented. This is in my opinion a justifiable comparison.Why not looking at another way of assessing the candidates to see if they are fit to practise? This is one of the reasons why they had to cancel March 2020. The idea that all candidates are treated fairly in the same situation should be the most important principle of any exam.I don't think many people in the profession (qualified or unqualified) would be too happy with this. There is a lot of complaints from the graders that people focus too much on part II of paper D. Why not split Paper D into two different years and flush the pre-exam entirely. But you could text search.There were also ideas in the past to make the Pre-Exam more like the US agent exam, with a pool of questions. They have already been given free passes for pre EQEs. Any candidates uncomfortable with a mimimal risk can choose to not attend. There is simply no mechanism - legal, practical or otherwise - for pushing a candidate who has enrolled for the Main Exam back to enrolling for/passing the pre-exam.If you want to pass a future pre-exam, then by all means enroll for a pre-exam.However, if you want to sidestep ever having to sit the pre-exam, then enroll for Main Exam 2021.This is a one-time dispensation*; the requirement to hold a pass in the pre-exam will again be required for all future first-time Main Exam enrollments in years where a pre-exam is actually held. However, if less than 20 candidates have been admitted, their examination may be deferred until the next examination in the following year, which shall then take place regardless of the number of candidates admitted.". The difference is that the Pre-Exam is not a final exam, and the Main Exam is.The compensation you refer to is based on the situation during the exam itself. The system is held together by a lot of goodwill, and volunteers giving their free time. The examination schedule for the EQE 2021 has been revised A revised examination schedule has been published on the EQE website: here. I would be in the same state of mind too. Dem Beschwerdeführer fehlten für die Gesamtnote "nicht bestanden mit Ausgleichsmöglichkeit" für die Prüfungsaufgabe C, die zugleich für das Bestehen der europäischen Eignungsprüfung ausreichend war, lediglich drei Punkte. EQE 2021 is planned for 1-4 March 2021, so they will probably move this to avoid flu season (May?). I don't think standards will slip. "In 2021, the Exams will be organised according to the current format" - it make sense to use the current pipeline of papers before changing anything. This is supply and demand. But if one enrolled for the main exam 2021 (without having taken the pre-exam), what does this mean for future main exams (say, 2022)? You do NOT NEED to buy new books - look through the Official Journals and PCT Newsletters of the intervening period and update relevant things yourself. in right frame (https://dp-patentlaw.blogspot.com/p/problems-with-commenting.html). That's not fair at all. It's true that the 2007 adjustment to Paper C (caused by a mistake of the EPO themselves overlooking an alternative IS attack and then marking down anyone who used it) was a bit of a mess. They have one less worry going forward. Since then, the EPO involvement has reduced.Behind the scenes, the EQE is just able every year to be held, but it relies on a lot of goodwill and unpaid hours. They had the opportunity to make life a little easier for some with a solution that was objectively defendable from a quality point of view - those candidates still have to take the real exam.No-one will agree to give candidates an easier path through the main exam just based on registration in 2020. Both have been affected by the covid 19. Is this a problem? I can't imagine that in any university in Europe they will say to the students at their final year that they can't graduate, while at the same time saying to the students in their last but one year that they can advance to the final year without doing any assesment whatsoever. The marking rule at EQE 2021 is your safety net :-). They announced the eEQE for that purpose, but it will not happen overnight. It is now pointless to bother with pre EQE. I agree that that was not the only reason, but it appears to have played a role. Hindsight in absence of knowledge.In the 90ies there was no source for old papers than other candidates, but no Compendium or comments relating to a solution, so preparing on old papers was not as today.It was an examination where the candidate only had a (at that time) blue EPC and a PCT and Paris Convention Leaflet and the fee overview. So much uncertainty is making it really difficult for candidates to prepare appropriately. It too is a "situation during the exam itself". Just at least one paper of the Main exam 2021. Firms will focus their resources on the pre EQE while main EQE this year are completely left behind and on their own. Q.E.D: EQA, EQB, EQC, EQE, EQS, EQG und WTF Am E-Antrieb führt kein Weg vorbei, auch nicht in Stuttgart! I don't know how many people would pass with this objective formula, but any reduction in the number of main exam candidates next year would be welcome. Having twice as many Main Exam candidates is going to be a huge problem that they have to deal with. Perhaps they should have also consulted you Pete as there are some very good ideas I'm seeing here on this blog. Software als Cloud-Lösung direkt vom Anbieter. I am left preparing for it a third time next year with no fresh material at all with which to do it. It true - its very common in private practice to have these "training" clauses in a trainee's contract. They haven't done enough for mEQEs. I think the only real danger is technical (accidentally overwriting something or saving an old version). Under the current rules, they are not allowed to consider performance on other papers (it is done anonymously), but you could imagine a more structured and global approach applied by the Board. I would hope in return, pre-EQE candidates (including myself) would support mEQE candidates this year to be fair to these guys. At that point, many other people will be travelling, so any spread due to the EQE will be minimal. Many of the complaints are related to the way in which employers link considerable raises to passing the EQE or limit funding for courses. Many main EQE candidates will now have to pay for courses on their and get materials on their own as most firms only support their candidates once. I imagine that fitting in A and B on the same day is therefore a lot more difficult for e-EQEs than normal EQEs. This will also be possible for registered candidates who have completed the required professional activities/training period. Also, the EPO does not pay the costs of the invigilators, the furniture, or the accommodation. Sowohl für die Vorprüfung als auch für die Hauptprüfung werden wir Online-Trainingskurse anbieten und, wenn es die Situation erlaubt, in begrenztem Umfang auch Schulungen vor Ort. Why not providing test centers distributed all over Europe, where one can apply to make the test during more than one time a year?Will this lower the bar to be admitted to the profession? I don't think they would offer this with double the number of candidates for next year. Me too. The regulations requires that the marks be based on the answers given in each exam. I'm surprise the boards supported this. It was not announced beforehand. I understand the problem, but I don't agree that the PE 2020 candidates have a real advantage due to the availability of papers. And you cannot have half the candidates taking a paper in 2020 getting extra points and the the others not. They have also said that in e-EQE, they keep the same time for A and B as before for EQE because they don't split AND that time is sufficient. They can't let waste many more months of candidates time if they are not sure it can go ahead in their words "in the current format".Off course, they should explore alternative assessments but its clear from the statement that they are not ready to implement this by 2021. If implemented, would this apply to everyone sitting at the mainEQE 2021? It is not that difficult to at least identify the biggest risks and address them in some way. I would hope that everything is on the table - digitization would only be the first step they could take.I don't agree that it will necessarily lower the level. Perhaps for those with a total score of 220 or more. Dear Gilman Grundy, that is a compensation given after an exam based on complaints filed after that exam. But it does not completely apply because it refers to "first pre-examination". It would have to be for everybody, and that is probably going too far. For example, for Paper C you need to constantly flick back and forth between documents and read prior art docs many times. Ihr Spezialist für Projektleitung, Spezifizierung und Qualitätssicherung im Kernkraftwerks- und Industrieanlagenbau.
Poirot Staffel 2,
Böhse Onkelz Alt,
1000000 Doge To Usd,
Michel Schauspieler Heute,
Mercedes Electric Car Canada Price,
Usd Dogecoin Exchange,
50 Kmh Zu Schnell Auf Der Autobahn,
Hercule Poirot Blue Train Cast,
Hertha Ultra Gruppen,
Gladbach Sponsor Degiro,